>>
>>15087
What's the point?
Who do you believe?
I personally believe that anyone, who
takes the idea that repeated observation of phenomena,
along with debate about what the observations mean
and scrutiny of the method by which observations were made
Experimentation, theory, peer review, and acceptance, or rejection, has a stronger argument
than anyone who insists on reffering to some invisible omnipotent being with questionable judgement, an appalling sense of morals and ethics, and refuses to show up for any debate, and whose followers have committed the greatest atrocities on earth over the last 4000 years