File 177473014834.jpg - (1.03MB , 3600x3056 , AttemptToExplain.jpg )

Here's the chapter were she implies it was common practice to rape page boys. They were between 7-12 years old at employment.

File 177473017043.jpg - (111.73KB , 800x881 , DeadBodyEroticism.jpg )

An example of her lusting after a dead body (acted)

File 17747302512.jpg - (81.29KB , 615x924 , HeDoesntLookSoGood.jpg )

Saint Sebastian was executed by arrows. There's painting of him bound to a tree and shot with arrows, but also paintings of women healing him. (he barely survived).

Apparently women were VERY MUCH into these Paintings. They totally lusted after the paintings of men bound and suffering.

Anyway, eventually the church frowned upon paintings of man and woman being so intimate with one another...

File 177473029718.jpg - (151.43KB , 1070x881 , EroticPlay.jpg )

>>19087
And then they replaced the women in these paintings witch Cherubs (naked child Angels).

And as the feminist author puts it: this only turned these paintings even more so into "erotic play".

File 17747304298.jpg - (206.01KB , 802x1168 , Chastity.jpg )

Also interesting: there's a chapter about "Chastity" fighting "love".

Chastity is personified by a fully clothed woman.

And the man is nearly naked. "Love" is shooting his last arrow into "Chastity's" shield.

It's an allegory or symbolism for how man can be deprived of sex and children until old age whereafter they turn desperate and are more likely to agree to things which otherwise they would not.

Acting chaste in public is just a strategy for women.

File 177473056868.jpg - (260.92KB , 737x1550 , FalseRapeAccusations.jpg )

There's also multiple pages dedicated to women making false accusations of rape.

Often times after a man refused to have sex with that woman. Sometime's it's a close family relative like an Aunt doing this.

... This makes it apparent how women can rape men. When women rape men it's "institutional". Because when you make a false accusations it's "institutions" which will ruin the life of that man.

As asinine as this sounds: when feminists write about "institutional sexual assault" they actually mean women raping men. (but you have to read feminist literature to understand that)

File 177473534138.jpg - (272.63KB , 1330x2048 , 20260307_001334.jpg )

>>19086
If that's what they look like, I'd would have raped one myself. Bro looks fucking good man. Aesthetic physique.

But I don't understand why you're writing all this, it's common knowledge that boys were raped back in the day. I think even in Sparta they did it, although don't quote me on that. There was a lot man on man live in ancient Greece and Rome. Hell even in Alexanders army half of them were fags, that's why they fought so well - had to protect their lovers.

>>19090
There's no such thing as institutional rape. Except when you have a backwards gynocentric society that makes both men and women miserable and either stagnates it all or straight up destroys the civilization and one could argue that only by moving forward can you avoid destruction - stagnation IS destruction.

So the problem isn't what we see on the surface such as women falsely accusing men of rape. It is that men are fucking pussies and have allowed the "vibes in the air" or "consensus opinions" to rule the civilization which is the feminine way of government (they are not supposed to govern, only to receive the luxury and benefits, they cannot handle actual power)...

Well, and it goes even deeper than that, but I don't want to expand too much lest nobody reads it, but actually it's men at the top who have hijacked the system for their shortsighted and selfish reasons of control. Or some of that devil worshiping shit which is really just boredom or psychopathy on their part.

I don't believe society as a whole, humanity as a whole is that dumb. There is agency involved in the predicament that we are in, it's not purely a result of retardation on a global mass scale. Agency by a few, you could say - bad actors, but highly agentic bad actors, which in a certain way is actually admirable. At least they're not standing by idly, which the good men tend to do, because the ones who are most capable of handling power, usually want to have it the least - for them it's a responsibility, not a thrill or a way to quench boredom or prop up ego which is ultimately a cheap reward compared to community creativity and more transcendent rewards available only to the wise and the willing to let go of the small me and take a good look at what could actually very well COULD be.

>>19092
You mean the schizophrenic influencing machine. (when it's really ancient technology)

I'm trying to figure out how to explain it to people without sounding like a schizophrenic.

>>19092
>"vibes in the air" or "consensus opinions"

What convinces people to not just be open about that?

File 177473832166.jpg - (167.21KB , 800x1048 , ImpliedCoitus.jpg )

She writes about how certain poses in paintings imply Coitus.

That's frankly very obvious... and yet everyone pretends this isn't what it's obviously is.

Also: since 1500 Cupid was increasingly depicted as trying to bang his own mother (venus/aphrodite)

>>19092
>but actually it's men at the top who have hijacked the system for their shortsighted and selfish reasons of control

If men were in control - we wouldn't see an increase in male genital mutilation of developed country.

I know exactly what you talk about (in so far that is possible) and it's so obviously the women who are running it.

>>19094
It's not about openness, it's about the final decision which should not be the consensus, because it is dumb as hell, the masses are dumb as hell, because the average IQ is 100.

Or maybe I misunderstood your question. I probably did, because the answer (in my interpretation) is actually obvious.

>>19096
Well, you know, not everything is as it seems.

First of all there are psychopaths

And second of all there are short-sided and bored sociopaths or just shortsighted individuals

And these groups tend to want to hoard power, because more transcendent forms of pleasure just go completely under the radar for them

In a way it's natural

But yes, mostly men, which then allow the gynocentric government to run the masses so as to easier control the masculine principle within the masses...

it's just a bit complicated, but in reality it's quite simple. They're using women to disarm the males. Women don't realize they're being used, but in the end it's all for the agentic purposes of the few on top. Well at least has been that way for a while. The gynocentric ruling moreso just when mass information and mass public opinion started aka fhe age of the internet.

File 177474156238.jpg - (60.60KB , 358x387 , SeminalDucts.jpg )

>>19098
That seems really off-topic, but: Did you know that the Hexenhammer mentioned that witches can magically close the seminal ducts? And that it makes men sterile but still able to spurt out (infertile) semen?

And the Hexenhammer was released 1486 and we didn't perform the first animal tests on seminal ducts until >1600?

I know that sounds really off-topic, but it was simply a "vibe in the air" that this is somehow relevant to what you write.

File 177474165519.png - (765.58KB , 538x796 , Manifesto_A.png )

>>19098
But perhaps is some more literature which could be related. This one is by Valerie Solanos. She writes in her Manifesto that once society is sufficiently automated men will be exterminated.

File 17747421968.jpg - (100.10KB , 800x639 , BoysWillBeAnnihilated.jpg )

>>19100
But even staying on topic: In the same book about boys she asserts that boys will later be annihilated because society has no use for them.

In fact, much feminist literature asserts that boys / men will be killed. Even old feminist literature does.

File 177474233367.jpg - (221.46KB , 800x1480 , Hermaphroditus.jpg )

Maybe that's also interesting: The term "hermaphrodite" originates from a story about a woman raping a man.

(the man keeps refusing, so she prays to the gods - and the gods answer her prayers and fuse their bodies together)

Something very few people know about about. Or at least i never heard anyone mention this ere i read this book.

>>19100
Yeah, I thought about this, one thing for sure, things are going to change drastically. It could be for the better also not just for the worse. The intersexual relationships will definitely change big time.

>>19102
Yeah, when I have sex (I'm psychic) I actually fuse bodies together, it's kind of trippy, like having two bodies at the same time, it's not like they physically fuse but in my consciousness I have two bodies.

>>19104
That sounds a lot of fun. But i wonder what you had to do in order to become Psychic. Based on what i read it doesn't seem like something that's just handed out.

>>19105
Hmmm hard to tell

But I was born with abnormal brain

>>19105
Gotta keep that thalamic gate open I suppose, and that tuning IS largely dependent on prenatal as well as early childhood phases.

>>19106
>hard to tell

I bet.

>early childhood phases.

What happened in your early childhood?

>>19107
>early childhood phases
Since you answered this thread i suspect you can relate to this book?

>>19109
Which book? I can relate to that I was extremely horny as a very little child. I don't think that was normal.

But as far as my psychic abilities, I think it's mostly because of prenatal very high testosterone which hypermasculinized my brain. Which in turn made my thalamus very open which in turn puts a lot of raw data to process into my conscious awareness. But there are other brain conditions in which that happens. However in my case I am severely autistic.

As for early childhood, That's why I said it's hard to tell, nothing specific that I can tell you. Even though it was quite extreme. But the crescendo was reached around 16-19 years old. Of just madness. However I understood myself very little back then and my psychic abilities, I didn't really very well even recognize that I had them.

>>19102
>fuse their bodies together
Speaking of fusing bodies together...
Did you know that the body of a mother always participates in a 2-sided exchange of cells with every child she carries? And these cells survive, successfully integrate, and stay functional until death and can participate in similar exchanges in the future?
This means that you… Yes, you. Have your mother's cells living inside your body if you're a man.
And have your older brothers', or your mother's older brothers', or your grandmother's… Yeah. If you're a woman.
Which means that most every human has both male and female cells living in their body.

>>19110
>I don't think that was normal.

You think it was related to whatever gave you psychic abilities?

...

Have you ever looked up the influencing machine or the "air loom"? Because that's a bunch of people experiencing something which they themselves did not consider psychic but they all had eerily similar experiences and i wonder if you can relate to their experiences.

>>19113
Yeah all related. High prenatal T, autistic brain with wide open thalamus...

>Have you ever looked up the influencing machine or the "air loom"?
Yeah, looked up just now. can't say that has much to do with my case. I'm just more noticing and tuned to... a large amount of data that all of us is being flooded with, except more of it reaches my conscious mind than is usual. Like having more attention than is usual. Like being alert. Not anxious, at least not anymore, not afraid or fight or flight, but more alert is the best word. I bet my amygdala is also larger and more active than is usual.

Just have abnormal brain, so although that's not the reason, I suppose it helped me to notice things. I'm not like a great psychic, I know people way more sensitive than me and they HAD actually indeed developed that way past childhood, but I'm ok where I am, it's not like I'm seeking psychic abilities, I just have some.

>>19114
You must've done lots of research about the brain. What motivated you to do this?

Speaking of alert a bunch of books i read noted that panic comes of pan the satyr.

>>19115
just curious about how shit works. and I'm severely autistic, which means I like systemizing and analyzing.

and also drug experiences were particularly surprising and extremely hard to explain to any extent, makes a bit more sense now, but still very curious...

>panic comes of pan the satyr
intredasting

>>19116
You keep emphasizing that you are autistic. It helps with noticing patterns, though to me it seems like one has to make experiences with the supernatural to be able to grasp certain patterns in the first place (or be able to believe certain things).

The biggest difficulty appears in making others grasp it who haven't yet made these supernatural experiences.

You said when you have sex your bodies fuse together. Are you male or female? What is that like?

>>19117
I'm a male. Having sex with a female. And I said exactly what it's like, it's like having two bodies simultaneously.

It's very pleasurable. But you have to really love the woman or the girl.

It also feels, for a lack of a better word - like electricity. Like a voltage between the two bodies / entities and especially through contact, that voltage is discharging from one to the other. And it feels kind of like pure pleasure, but of course sexual energy flavored. And by the way I'm mostly talking here about making out and foreplay. Because that's pretty much all I do during sex. Haven't yet ever seriously intended to have children so no cumming anywhere near pussy for me... (I don't trust protection and hormonal chemical shit I wouldn't put my woman through that)

And it all also feels automatic. Like you do not really intend how things go, it is a flow state. And it is highly creative, it's not the kind of sex you see in porn. And it is highly restrained. Like in your consciousness you experience some wild shit, even visions, but in the actual physical reality it is expressed by very restrained action and yet that action is charged with that energy that was in your mind and she receives it, if that makes sense. Now you make me want to miss her.

Wouldn't know. Please stop ddosing me.

>>19118
The electricity you describe - it can also close the seminal ducts: >>19099

(it can even close important arteries, but i believe they have rules against using it in a way which does actual harm - maybe that will one day be highly relevant for you to know!!!! - don't be frightened into doing things which you shouldn't do)

But it sounds like it's not you who has control over that.

...

Reading feminist literature it sure sounds like women like to do a thing were it seems like the man is in charge (when it's really them).

Did you exclusively experience this with her? How did you meet?

>>19120
Oh I'm pretty sure I was in control.

Met in a group event. She caught my eye immediately, but I played it very low key at first and she later admitted she was surprised how our relationship evolved whereas, even though I didn't know how it'd all turn out, I started walking in that direction from the very beginning...

As for other women, I haven't ever been that into anyone, at least not out of the ones that I had sexual access to, so yeah I would say I experienced that exclusively with her although something of the sort I also experienced with my mother when I was like 7, but that's a story for another time.

>>19121
Funny thing BTW, in that group event, there was another girl that I also liked, but she wasn't my focus and didn't captivate my imagination nearly the same way, well I later learned that that second girl actually liked me ..

.. and another funny thing is that when we were doing like a meditation in a circle I actually wanted that first girl, the one that I was immediately drawn to, to sit next to me and to hold hands with her, well it was the second girl that ended up sitting next to me and the first girl didn't even show up and yet I was in the meditation imagining that it was the first girl that was sitting there and feeling this intense energy and then the girl that was actually sitting there, after the meditation, reported that she felt very intense energy coming from me, we were holding hands in a circle, but the report was specifically from my direction not from the circle in general (the energy which I was kind of channeling into her body, but like through her body into the first girl that was actually fueling my imagination and energy) so I don't know if the story even makes any sense, but yeah, that happened.

Other times for example I just hug people and immediately kind of know not just their current state but almost like what kind of a person they are. I feel their aura you could say. Yeah, it's not just to hig somebody and especially women, bro I can differentiate so much, and it's not just because of how they squeeze you or not squeeze you, I'm telling you, it's more subtle than that. You can feel their energy.

Well, anyway, this is schizoposting by most anyone's standards, we should move this to /x/ if that's the direction we're going to continue to drift in